But officials also noted that data has not been consistent so it is difficult to identify trends. But the number appears to be an increase over previous years where the totals were in the low two-digits. The number of substantiated cases may be small compared to the size of the military, which includes more than 2 million active duty and reserve troops. And extremist groups routinely recruit former and current service members because of their familiarity with weapons and combat tactics. The risk of extremism in the military can be more dangerous because many service members have access to classified information about sensitive military operations or other national security information that could help adversaries. But, he added, “even the actions of a few can have an outsized impact on unit cohesion, morale and readiness - and the physical harm some of these activities can engender can undermine the safety of our people.” In a message to the force on Monday, Austin said the department believes that only a few service members violate their oath and participate in extremist activities. But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and other leaders launched a broader campaign to root out extremism in the force after it became clear that military veterans and some current service members were present at the Jan. The military has long been aware of small numbers of white supremacists and other extremists among the troops. The officials provided additional details about the rules on condition of anonymity because they were not made public. But several officials said that as a study group spoke with service members this year they found that many wanted clearer definitions of what was not allowed. What was wrong yesterday is still wrong today, said one senior defense official. Previous policies banned extremist activities but didn’t go into such great detail, and also did not specify the two-step process to determine someone accountable. The rules also specify that commanders must determine two things in order for someone to be held accountable: that the action was an extremist activity, as defined in the rules, and that the service member “actively participated” in that prohibited activity. The new policylays out in detail the banned activities, which range from advocating terrorism or supporting the overthrow of the government to fundraising or rallying on behalf of an extremist group or “liking” or reposting extremist views on social media.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |